web analytics
29 Dec

Testability by Deduction

In the first chapter it was mentioned that the scholastic dictum, “Nihil est in intellectu quod nonpriusfuerit in sensu“, was too narrow; it is in fact equivalent to Hume’s criterion that for a word to have meaning it must denote something with instances.

It is now clear exactly why this is too narrow; there is no instance denoted by the word “gravitation”, and gravitation can be in the intellect even though it cannot be sensed. It is perhaps noteworthy that among early philosophers Berkeley, who was much against the use of words without a corresponding idea, concede that there was a legitimate use of words like “gravitation”.

In that chapter it was indicated that for the scientific outlook a concept must be capable of of being related to perception, directly or indirectly; it is now clear what is the precise way in which a concept is indirectly related to perception — it is by the mechanism of testability by deduction. We may also say that Ockham’s razor expresses this: entities that cannot be related to perception even indirectly are unnecessary and not to be introduced.

J. O. Wilson (2013) Foundations of Inference in Natural Science, London: Routledge, pp. 50-1. The original edition was published in 1952. The book outlines views of scientific inference developed since the end of World War I up to the 1950s (see PhilPapers).

J. O. Wisdom’s early career was focused on philosophy of science, producing three papers on Berkeley’s criticism of Newton, Causation and the Foundations of Science (1946), one of the earliest critiques of the logical positivists “The Metamorphosis of Philosophy” (1947) and Foundations quoted from above, which includes the first full-length exposition of Popper’s views (Popper was his head of department in the LSE).

His next book, The Unconscious Origin of Berkeley’s Philosophy (1953) used psychoanalysis in analysing Berkeley’s work. The book scandalised the English scholars, leading Wisdom to move to the United States. He wrote on psychoanalysis and outlined his views ideas on world-views, self and society in Philosophy and its Place in Our Culture (1975).

He should not confused with his cousin, the philosopher John Wisdom.

Further Reading

I. C. Jarvie (1993) “Obituary: J. O. Wisdom” in The Independent [4 March 1993] (online).

Thomas Duddy (2002) A History of Irish Thought, London:Routledge, pp. 301-5.

Thomas Duddy (2004) “Wisdom, J. O. (1908-93)” in Thomas Duddy (ed) Dictionary of Irish Philosophers, Thoemes, pp. 375-377.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on Twittershare on TumblrShare on LinkedInGoogle+Print this pageEmail to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *